There are two discrete ways to direct numbers online and how this relates to online commercialism.

First, near is a ranking - an shadow of gen near parent-child interaction between categories or items. For instance, if "beverage" is the parent, family would be milk, water, or a rum cocktail. All daiquiris are beverages, but not all beverages are daiquiris (for most of us). A devout trial is the Dewey Decimal set of connections. Books are housed via a set grouping of organization supported on hierarchy. The benefits of such a grouping is the use of a public speech (continuity, certainty) and the ocular entreaty (relationships easy to entree). However this regulations is hard and does not respond to changes completed occurrence.

Now, nearby is a new policy of cataloguing. Tags are a "type of meta-data involving the club of descriptors next to objects," which unsophisticatedly method categories connected with items after the reality or on a item-by-item basis. Tags are flexible, occupation intersecting cultures and languages, can be used by the journalist or a reader, and assists beside activity. Examples of tag use consider del.icio.us and Flickr where on earth users can synchronize and allocation bookmarks and photos, severally. The detriments to mistreatment this brand of organizing convention is that in attendance is no human relationship relating items (no parent-child ranking) and no relation beside the balance of the terms (homophones, for prototype).

It seems to me that we are active to have to find out the old trusty taxonomies near the Web 2.0 ones. But how is this possible? They may be mutually exclusive; the use of ubiquitous categories, for example, deliberately excludes the use of tags planned by others. I speculate that may well be a back-end set of contacts of suggesting tags to users based on what others have used, by this means providing a better instance of transposable tags. But we are plentiful old age out from a group showing intelligence planned sufficient to read the intricacies and nuances of English (much less other than languages).

If Web 1.0 is a one-way method of providing in high spirits to the scholarly person (thus, class-conscious) and Web 2.0 is a two-way dialogue (using tagging), later peradventure Web 3.0 is where on earth users are tied to other than users and where each person is a exultant initiator and easygoing user - peradventure this is once many conclusion will crop up. Online marketers are unambiguously positioned to craft this adjust and the human or individuals to get in fore of this woe will apt profits handsomely.

ighiii 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()